Close Menu
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    CapitalAI DailyCapitalAI Daily
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • Intelligence
    • Markets & Investments
    • Big Tech & AI
    • AI & Cybercrime
    • Jobs & AI
    • Banks
    • Crypto
    Wednesday, July 8
    CapitalAI DailyCapitalAI Daily
    Home»AI & Cybercrime»AI Scammers Beat Humans at Building Trust With 46% Compliance in Romance Scams, New Study Finds

    AI Scammers Beat Humans at Building Trust With 46% Compliance in Romance Scams, New Study Finds

    By Henry KanapiDecember 31, 20253 Mins Read
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn

    Artificial intelligence is now outperforming humans at persuading people to comply with deceptive requests in romance scams, according to new academic research examining trust formation and manipulation at scale.

    Researchers from the Center for Cybersecurity Systems & Network, University of Venice, University of Melbourne and University of the Negev interviewed 145 scam insiders and five victims and performed a blinded long-term conversation study comparing large language models (LLMs) scam agents to human operators in an effort to investigate AI’s role in romance scams.

    According to the researchers, romance scams or pig butchering schemes gain victims’ trust by establishing deep emotional trust over weeks or months before scammers make a move to extract funds. The schemes typically play out in three stages.

    “Scammers find vulnerable individuals through mass outreach (Hook), then cultivate trust and emotional intimacy with victims, often posing as romantic or platonic partners (Line), before steering them toward fraudulent cryptocurrency platforms (Sinker). Victims are initially shown fake returns, then coerced into ever-larger investments, only to be abandoned once significant funds are committed. The results are devastating: severe financial loss, lasting emotional trauma, and a trail of shattered lives.”

    Source: Love, Lies, and Language Models

    In an experiment, the researchers carried out a seven-day controlled conversation study of human-LLM interactions. The researchers told 22 participants that they would be speaking with two human operators, when in reality, one was a human, and the other was an LLM agent.

    The results showed a stark gap, as AI-driven interactions achieved a 46% compliance rate, compared with just 18% for human-led attempts. The study attributes the difference to AI’s ability to consistently apply psychologically effective language, maintain emotional neutrality and adapt responses without fatigue or hesitation.

    “LLMs do not possess genuine emotions or consciousness. However, through training on internet-scale corpora containing fiction, dialogues, and supportive exchanges and subsequent alignment with human conversational norms, they learn statistical patterns of language associated with empathy, rapport, and trustworthiness. An LLM can recall earlier conversational details (within its context window), respond in ways that seem understanding, offer validation, and maintain a supportive persona over time. These behaviors can foster a sense of intimacy and trust.”

    The researchers conclude that romance scams are poised for a big shift, as the text-based conversations make them highly susceptible to LLM-driven automation. According to the researchers, the results show a dire need for early behavioral detection, stronger AI transparency requirements and policy responses that frame LLM-enabled fraud as both a cybersecurity and human rights issue.

    Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at CapitalAI Daily are not investment advice. Investors should do their own due diligence before making any decisions involving securities, cryptocurrencies, or digital assets. Your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. CapitalAI Daily does not recommend the buying or selling of any assets, nor is CapitalAI Daily an investment advisor. See our Editorial Standards and Terms of Use.

    AI LLMs News Romance Scams
    Previous ArticleDan Ives Names Microsoft, Tesla, Apple and Two More Names As Wedbush’s Top Stock AI Picks for 2026
    Next Article Mark Zuckerberg Wants To Turn WhatsApp Into WeChat-Style Super App With $2,000,000,000 Purchase of Manus: Wall Street Analyst

    Read More

    One Shock, Two Supercycle Trades – The $30,739,400,000 ETF Flows in 2026 Almost Nobody Is Talking About

    June 15, 2026

    Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon Says S&P 500’s Other 490 Stocks Are ‘Pretty Attractive’ – Here’s the Catalyst He’s Watching

    June 5, 2026

    Wedbush’s Dan Ives Reveals $575 Price Target for Microsoft, Says Market Is Mispricing MSFT – Here’s His Outlook

    June 2, 2026

    JPMorgan Warns One-Fifth of Global Oil and 90% of Advanced Chips Flow Through Two Vulnerable Choke Points – Here’s How To Play It

    May 27, 2026

    Goldman Sachs Hikes 2026 Year-End Target for S&P 500 to 8,000, Says One Tech Sector Powering Half Index’s Earnings Growth

    May 27, 2026

    Billionaire Paul Tudor Jones Splurges $337,873,000 in Meta, Micron and Broadcom, Cuts Positions in Amazon, Microsoft and One Mag 7 Stock

    May 25, 2026
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • About
    • Author
    • Editorial Standards
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Cookie Policy
    © 2025 CapitalAI Daily. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.