Close Menu
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    CapitalAI DailyCapitalAI Daily
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • Intelligence
    • Markets & Investments
    • Big Tech & AI
    • AI & Cybercrime
    • Jobs & AI
    • Banks
    • Crypto
    Tuesday, June 23
    CapitalAI DailyCapitalAI Daily
    Home»Jobs & AI»Generative AI More Than Doubles Output of High-Skill Employees in Specialist Roles, According to Study

    Generative AI More Than Doubles Output of High-Skill Employees in Specialist Roles, According to Study

    By Henry KanapiOctober 15, 20252 Mins Read
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn

    A new field experiment by the National Bank of Slovakia finds that generative AI can more than double the productivity of skilled professionals working on specialized tasks.

    Researchers randomly assigned access to OpenAI’s GPT-4o to central bank employees and measured their performance across both generalist and specialist assignments.

    The results reveal striking differences in how AI reshapes output depending on skill and task type. While all participants improved when using AI, the biggest gains were concentrated among top performers handling complex, domain-specific work.

    “Generative AI increased performance in specialized tasks by between 108 and 117%, slightly more than twice the impact on generalist tasks.”

    That effect was far stronger than the average improvement recorded for generalist work.

    “Access to generative AI doubled performance in our specialized, domain-specific tasks, compared to 50% improvements for the generalist tasks.”

    The findings suggest that generative AI not only accelerates routine output but also amplifies the efficiency of experts who can integrate the technology into analytical and creative workflows. The report notes that “high-skilled workers with domain expertise and prior generative AI exposure were able to effectively integrate generative AI into their work practices on the specialist tasks.”

    Researchers also observed broad benefits across the workforce.

    “94% of participants scored higher when they had access to generative AI versus when they did not.”

    The study emphasizes that these gains occurred without sacrificing efficiency. Participants completed tasks roughly 21% faster on average when using AI tools, highlighting the dual benefit of higher quality and shorter turnaround times.

    While the study suggests how generative AI could be used to augment human labor, a group of Stanford researchers sounded the alarm about the negative impact of the tech on the workforce. In August, a study authored by Erik Brynjolfsson, Prasanna Chandar, and Daniel Chen showed that the job market has not been kind to young workers, especially those exposed to generative AI fields.

    “Since the widespread adoption of generative AI, early-career workers (ages 22–25) in the most AI-exposed occupations have experienced a 13% relative decline in employment even after controlling for firm-level shocks.”

    Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at CapitalAI Daily are not investment advice. Investors should do their own due diligence before making any decisions involving securities, cryptocurrencies, or digital assets. Your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. CapitalAI Daily does not recommend the buying or selling of any assets, nor is CapitalAI Daily an investment advisor. See our Editorial Standards and Terms of Use.

    AI Employees generative AI OpenAI
    Previous ArticleElon Musk Says X To Go ‘Full AI’ Next Month, Grok Set To Scan 100 Million Posts Daily
    Next Article Three AI Startups With Combined $83 Billion Worth Generating Zero Revenue, According to Venture Capitalist Deedy Das

    Read More

    One Shock, Two Supercycle Trades – The $30,739,400,000 ETF Flows in 2026 Almost Nobody Is Talking About

    June 15, 2026

    JPMorgan Says Investors Should ‘Buckle Up’ for Price Swings From SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs – Here’s the Bank’s Outlook

    June 5, 2026

    Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon Says S&P 500’s Other 490 Stocks Are ‘Pretty Attractive’ – Here’s the Catalyst He’s Watching

    June 5, 2026

    Wedbush’s Dan Ives Reveals $575 Price Target for Microsoft, Says Market Is Mispricing MSFT – Here’s His Outlook

    June 2, 2026

    Sam Altman Says He Misspoke on AI and Jobs, Clarifies AI Outperforms Professionals Only at ‘Small Tasks’ in 44 Occupations

    June 1, 2026

    JPMorgan Warns One-Fifth of Global Oil and 90% of Advanced Chips Flow Through Two Vulnerable Choke Points – Here’s How To Play It

    May 27, 2026
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • About
    • Author
    • Editorial Standards
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Cookie Policy
    © 2025 CapitalAI Daily. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.